One of the assignments to my class was to read Jean Rosenthal's chapter on Collaboration from her book The Magic of Light. Then also read the Robert Wierzel interview in Live Design on how he collaborates with Bill T. Jones. We were struck by how the notion of collaboration has evolved over the past 30 years. I loved the following paragraph from the Robert Wierzel interview:
What is the starting image, he asks. The answer he gets is: it sounds like this. Twenty years ago I'd have thought this a form of arrogance or felt that someone was jerking me around. Today, I feel this is exactly the right answer. All too often I get the information that does me no good. I've learned to press for what I need. Telling me that, "it is about the Salem Witch Trial", for example, means nothing. I'll ask, is that really what you are exploring? The clue given immediately makes me begin guessing....
As you can see, the clue given can take me in too many directions. I need clues along the lines of the abstract idea -- tension, conflict, cooperation, support, anger, pain, joy. I need the thesaurus words for introspection and presentation to be led on how my lights can support this dance. We need our choreographers to lead us. I don't want to hear, "I imagined a down pool to open the piece." I'd rather hear, "It opens with a feeling of isolation." The difference being that I can do what I do best. I may come up with a down pool since I am being lead by the sense of isolation. But I may solve it in ways the choreographer had not imagined yet serves even better. Isolation could be a thin band of light for both sides of the stage -- or maybe ten other choices to explore. Choreographers have to have a take on what they are wrestling with: be it strictly movement based or concept driven. The inspiration for a piece is interesting yet for me to do my job I need the commentary on the subject. To read the Rober Wierzel interview, click here. |


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home