Improv, Jazz and ShowtimeI am not sure when I began looking at modern dance in the context of a broader art movement. I think it was when I went to see Dennon and Sayhber Rawles teach a work shop in Jazz Dance ... and they put the entire experience in the context of Jazz Music. Now I could suddenly see why Miles Davis might cover a Cole Porter song. Or John Coltrane might cover a song from The Sound of Music. It seems that as the number of artists has grown that the major art forms have settled into almost undefined factions. Jazz music has splintered into areas like acid jazz and jazz fusion. Dance is splintered into modern, post-modern and contemporary. New work in Theater seems to be still based on improv or on a grand scale. The relationships of the main art forms don't seem quite so connected (perhaps because we are in the middle of it) and the artists are not responding to each other. Oddly, a lot of new work is spectacle. Is it wrong to expect some sophistication from our audiences? Must we create presentational dance as an entertainment to be commercial enough to succeed? Is it wrong to try an engage our audiences on some level that challenges their perceptions of Art and art-making? I hope that, someday, I can look back on this period in time and be able to put it into the context of a broader art movement. |


2 Comments:
At 3:52 PM,
Benoit said…
From where I'm coming from, it seems to me that reality TV and all of those types of entertainment are just making the young audience a bit dull on the inside and, well, I wish they weren't all look-a-like. I do find interesting the notion of decomposition of the mainstream into nuances that makes me happy. The sound of music is a great example and I want to say there needs to be more. I don't enjoy listening to the same sound over and over and I don't like to look like everyone else. Is that a product of the media, let's sell our soul to the devil while we are a it.
Cheers,
b
At 11:42 AM,
Natalia said…
I know I left a long comment on another post, and I don't want this to turn into another long, long reply, but I did want to reply to one thing you wrote:
"Is it wrong to try an engage our audiences on some level that challenges their perceptions of Art and art-making?"
I am a huge fan of art. Beyond just my own passion for dancing, I am a big fan of visual art and music. And I have to point out that this whole "challenging their perceptions of art and art-making" theme is extremely pervasive in the art world.
As a consumer of art, I have had my perceptions of art challenged, crushed, and beat into submission. I am tired of this self-referential idea of art about "what is art?"
Challenge my perceptions of life, history, interpersonal relationships, beauty, grief. *anything*. Help me see something in my life a new way, or see something in the world a new way.
The art world needs to be more outward-facing, not inward-facing.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home